Evidence Hub

Upadacitinib versus Tofacitinib in the Management of Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Alsaleh T, Mohammed A, Farooq A, Elamin M, Akl A, Yassin KM, Elnaggar A, Seminerio J

Inflammatory intestinal diseases, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Upadacitinib and tofacitinib, oral Janus kinase inhibitors, have demonstrated efficacy and safety in ulcerative colitis (UC) in clinical trials. However, real-world comparative data are limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies directly comparing upadacitinib to tofacitinib in UC management.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of multiple databases through August 2025 for studies comparing upadacitinib and tofacitinib for UC management. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) at weeks 8-14. Secondary outcomes included SFCR at later timepoints, clinical and endoscopic remission, biochemical remission, treatment discontinuation, colectomy, and safety. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2% statistic.

Results: Ten retrospective studies with 2,021 patients (879 upadacitinib and 1,142 tofacitinib) were analyzed. Upadacitinib was associated with significantly higher SFCR at weeks 8-14 (OR 1.98; 95% CI: 1.32-3.97; I 2 = 30%), 48-60 weeks (OR 2.32; 95% CI: 1.50-3.58; I 2 = 0%), and at the end of study follow-up (OR 3.60; 95% CI: 1.73-3.92; I 2 = 0%). Rates of endoscopic and biochemical remission did not differ significantly. Treatment discontinuation was less frequent with upadacitinib (OR 0.51; 95% CI: 0.34-0.77; I 2 = 22%). Overall safety was comparable, except for higher odds of acne with upadacitinib…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free