Evidence Hub

Assessment of regional variation in the management of heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction between the Russian Federation and the European Union: the results of the international survey

Kuzheleva E, Saldarriaga C, Mewton N, Komarova I, Mukhina N, Cherkasova N, Sitnikova V, Anzhela S et al.

BMJ open, 2025

Abstract

Objectives: Regional differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) care have been reported. We aimed to assess a physician-reported HFpEF management in the Russian Federation (RF) and a variation in the diagnosis and treatment of HFpEF between the RF and the European Union (EU).

Design/settings: It is a post hoc analysis of an academic web-based international HFpEF designed as a cross-sectional survey and conducted between May 2023 and July 2023.

Participants: Medical doctors who work in the fields of cardiology and general medicine.

Results: Among 1460 medical doctors who completed the study were 166 Russian and 646 European specialists. The responders were comparable across the groups in most of the baseline characteristics, except that RF specialists were less likely to be heart failure specialists (RF: 2% vs EU: 26%) and less often worked in academic environments (RF: 17% vs EU: 61%). The utilisation of specific echocardiography parameters (RF: 66% vs EU: 80%) and natriuretic peptides (RF: 83% vs EU: 91%) to establish a diagnosis of HFpEF was less frequent in RF compared with EU, while HFpEF scores were more likely to be used by Russian physicians (RF: 58% vs EU: 40%). In the settings when all HF medications are available, responders of both regions prioritised sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) (mean rank: RF: 2.6 (IQR: 2.3-3) vs EU: 2.3 (IQR: 2.2-2.5)), followed by diuretics in the EU and ACE inhibitors in the RF. Every…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free