Evidence Hub

Diagnostic Delays in Pediatric Acute Ischemic Stroke: 24-Year Trends and Contributing Factors in Switzerland

Brechbühl D, Everts R, Goeggel-Simonetti B, Nava E, Wohlgemuth C, Bauder F, Oesch G, Fluss J et al.

Stroke, 2026

314 participants

Abstract

Background: Growing evidence for reperfusion therapies in pediatric acute ischemic stroke (AIS) increases the importance of timely diagnosis within treatment windows. We therefore aimed to describe 24-year trends and associated factors of diagnostic delay.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide retrospective cross-sectional study including 314 children aged 28 days to 16 years from the Swiss Neuropediatric Stroke Registry (2000-2023). The primary outcome was time from stroke onset to diagnosis (TOD). Trends for diagnoses beyond intravenous thrombolysis (≥4.5 hours) and thrombectomy (≥24 hours) windows were assessed with multivariable logistic regression, and for continuous TOD with robust linear regression. Prespecified covariates were retained in multivariable models if associated with the outcome in univariable analyses. Analyses were stratified by AIS onset location (out-of-hospital and in-hospital).

Results: Median TOD was 26.9 hours (interquartile range, 10.1-91.5) between 2000 and 2023. During this period, the proportion diagnosed beyond the thrombolysis window decreased significantly in the overall cohort from 90.9% to 77.5% (adjusted odds ratio per calendar year 0.94 [95% CI, 0.88-1.00]) and in out-of-hospital AIS from 88.1% to 74.1% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91 [0.84-1.00]). No significant change was observed beyond the thrombectomy window diagnoses. Continuous TOD decreased significantly only in in-hospital AIS (β=-4.3 [-7.2 to -1.5]). Older age (β=-1.8 [-2.9 to -0.8]),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 314 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free