Evidence Hub

Global, regional, and national prevalence and determinants of volunteer work: a meta-analysis study using survey data

Manda S, Abdelatif N, Seabe D, Millard S, Kamuruko T

Frontiers in sociology, 2025

49,458 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: While there is an increasing recognition of the role of volunteer work in promoting global development, the factors influencing volunteering at both global and regional levels remain poorly understood. This study employed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of volunteering and to investigate variations in volunteer rates by gender, educational level, and age, both globally and at regional and country levels.

Methods: We analyzed data from 49,458 volunteers aged 15 and older across 37 World Values Surveys (WVS) conducted between 2000 and 2018 in 31 countries. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to calculate the overall prevalence of volunteering and to compare volunteer rates among different demographic groups: females vs. males, individuals with at least a secondary education vs. those with primary education or less, and individuals aged 35 years or older versus those under 35 years.

Results: The overall pooled prevalence of volunteering was found to be 39.93% (95% CI: 33.25-46.62). Significant disparities in volunteering rates were observed across regions and countries, with the highest rates recorded in Africa (61.15%, CI: 50.54-77.77) and the lowest in Europe (28.97%, CI: 19.43-38.51). Rates varied considerably, from a low of 19.16% in Russia (CI: 19.16%-22.76%) to a high of 80.27% in Tanzania (CI: 77.99-82.55%) and 72.00% in Uganda (CI: 69.18-76.22%). Volunteering in religious organizations was the most common type, accounting…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 49,458 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free