Evidence Hub

Long-term complications of continent cutaneous urinary diversion in adult spinal cord injured patients

Perrouin-Verbe MA, Chartier-Kastler E, Even A, Denys P, Rouprêt M, Phé V

Neurourology and urodynamics, 2016

29 participants · 39 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the long-term complications of continent cutaneous urinary diversion(CCUD) in spinal cord injured(SCI) patients unable to perform intermittent self-catheterization(ISC) through the urethra.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2001 and January 2012, adult SCI patients with a neurogenic bladder who underwent CCUD according to Mitrofanoff's/Monti's/Casale's principle were enrolled. A concomitant supratrigonal and augmentation enterocystoplasty were performed because of refractory detrusor overactivity or low bladder compliance. Early postoperative complications were reported according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Long-term complications, stomal and urethral continence, renal function, urodynamic parameters and quality-of-life were assessed.

RESULTS: Overall, 29 consecutive SCI patients were included, median age 35 years (IQR 26-46). Median follow-up time was 66 months (IQR 50-80). Two post-operative severe complications (grade III-IV) were reported. One patient had a stomal stenosis and another patient a tube stenosis. Both were treated by dilation. Two patients developed fistulae between the tube and the skin and required a surgical treatment. Three patients had bladder stones managed with endoscopy. Two patients had remnant stress urine leakage through the urethra, which was treated surgically: one received periurethral balloons(ACTTM ) and one a tension-free vaginal tape. Creatinine clearance remained stable postoperatively. Urodynamic parameters…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 29 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free