Evidence Hub

Continent coronary diversion--Mainz Pouch. 3-year personal experience

Kugler W, Schorn A

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 1991

15 participants

Abstract

Our experiences with the continent urinary diversion and the bladder substitution by means of the Mainz-Pouch technique are reported. We were one of the first Urological Departments in Austria to introduce this technique in late 1987. We present the operative technique, the patient material of 15 patients and their outcome with early and late complications over a follow up period of 16.6 months.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free