Evidence Hub

Continent catheterizable urinary channels: Lessons for lifelong urological care from a comparative analysis of very long-term complications and revision-free survival of three different types

Polm PD, Christiaans CHH, Dik P, Wyndaele MIA, de Kort LMO

Neurourology and urodynamics, 2024

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Continent catheterizable channels (CCC) provide an alternative route to the bladder in both pediatric and adult patients. This study compared very long-term complications and revision-free survival of three different CCC techniques: appendicovesicostomy (AVS), ileum (Monti), and tubularized bladder flap (TBF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Data from adult patients with CCC under surveillance at our academic tertiary referral urological center in 2020 and 2021 were collected. Both patients who acquired the CCC as a child and as an adult were included. The primary outcome was revision-free survival of the three CCC types. The secondary outcome was the prevalence of complications requiring surgical revision. Revisions were categorized as major (open subfascial or complete revisions) and minor (open suprafascial or endoscopic).

RESULTS: We included 173 CCCs (AVS 90, Monti 51, TBF 32). Median follow-up was 12.4 years (4.8-18). Mean revision-free survival was 162 ± 13 months, with no significant difference between the three types. Ninety-two individual CCCs (53%) required surgical revision and a total of 157 surgical revisions were performed. Seventy CCCs (40%) required major surgical revision: AVS (27/90%-30%), Monti (31/51%-61%), TBF (12/32%-38%).

CONCLUSION: Complications of CCCs are common; in this study with very long-term follow-up, more than half of CCCs required surgical revision. Revisions were more common in Monti…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free