Evidence Hub

The Indiana pouch: a technic for simple continent urinary diversion

Salomé F, Paulhac P, Hodonou R, Colombeau P, Pfeifer P

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie, 1997

16 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Description of the Indiana pouch, a continent urinary diversion after cystectomy for urogenital tumours, and for the sequelae of neurogenic and traumatic bladders.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: This was a retrospective study of 16 patients undergoing, between June 1991 and March 1995, cutaneous urinary diversion by ileocaecal graft, detubularized in the colonic segment, with continence ensured by the ileocaecal valve. The postoperative follow-up (4 to 36 months) was performed at 3, 6 and 12 months (abdominal ultrasonography alternating with abdominopelvic CT scan), then annually (CT scan). Finally, a urodynamic assessment was performed in 7 patients.

RESULTS: No early complications related to the reservoir were observed. Late complications of the diversion were related to the uretero-colonic anastomosis with 3 dilated renal subunits. Continence was achieved in 12 out of 15 patients, while one patient finally refused self-catheterization. In the patients in whom a urodynamic assessment was performed, the mean capacity of the reservoir was 671.4 +/- 273.9 mL for a filling pressure of between 3.7 +/- 1.6 and 11 +/- 2.5 cm H2O and an ileocaecal valve closure pressure of 97.9 +/- 117.1 cm H2O (full reservoir).

CONCLUSION: The Indiana pouch is a useful urinary diversion as it is simple to perform and is associated with a low revision rate, while ensuring low-pressure continence.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free