Evidence Hub

Failed bladder neck reconstruction: options for management

Gearhart JP, Canning DA, Jeffs RD

The Journal of urology, 1991

10 participants

Abstract

During the last 10 years 17 patients have been seen at this institution for persistent urinary incontinence after Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction. Of these patients 16 were born with classical bladder exstrophy and 1 with complete epispadias. Six patients underwent 1, 10 underwent 2 and 1 underwent 3 prior bladder neck procedures. As salvage procedures 8 patients underwent another Young-Dees-Leadbetter procedure, 1 repeat bladder neck reconstruction and augmentation cystoplasty, 3 augmentation alone, 4 bladder augmentation with creation of a continent abdominal stoma and 1 augmentation with implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter. Of the 8 patients who underwent a repeat Young-Dees-Leadbetter procedure 7 are dry for 3 hours or more and 1 is dry for greater than 3 hours on intermittent self-catheterization. All of those who are dry for greater than 3 hours are dry at night and 1 wears pads when engaging in strenuous physical activity. Of the 9 patients who underwent augmentation cystoplasty along with other adjunctive procedures 8 are continent for greater than 3 hours on intermittent catheterization, 6 are dry at night if they perform catheterization at bedtime and 1 remains totally incontinent after removal of the artificial urinary sphincter. Thus, with persistence and creativity a child with a previously failed bladder neck reconstruction or even multiple failed repairs can be made socially continent, providing a satisfactory alternative without…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free