Evidence Hub

Effect of baseline obesity and postoperative weight gain on the risk of channel revision following continent catheterizable urinary channel surgery

Chan KH, Szymanski KM, Li X, Ofner S, Flack C, Judge B, Whittam B, Misseri R et al.

Journal of pediatric urology, 2016

378 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prior studies suggest that obese patients are at increased risk for complications following continent catheterizable urinary (CCU) channel surgery. We hypothesized that postoperative weight gain increases the risk of channel angulation, difficulty catheterizing, and possible channel perforation requiring subfascial revision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether baseline obesity or becoming overweight/obese postoperatively was associated with a greater risk of subfascial revision.

METHOD: We reviewed retrospectively an institutional database of patients who underwent CCU channel surgery between the ages of ≥2 and <20 years from January 1990 to May 2013, excluding those with continent urinary reservoirs, continent vesicostomies, and those without body mass index (BMI) data. We collected data on patient/procedure characteristics, baseline/most recent BMI, and subfascial revision(s). We used Cox proportional hazard multivariable regression to assess the association of being overweight/obese at baseline (≥85% BMI) with time to first subfascial revision, and Fisher's exact test to compare rates of subfascial revision between those who became overweight/obese and those who did not.

RESULTS: Of the patients, 328/501 (65.5%) had baseline and post-baseline BMI data available: 53.4% male, 90.6% white, median age 7.4 years; median follow-up 76.4 months. Of the 328 patients, 38 (11.6%) had subfascial revisions. Baseline BMI data were available for 378 patients,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 378 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free