Evidence Hub

Continence in bladder exstrophy: determinants of success

Merguerian PA, McLorie GA, McMullin ND, Khoury AE, Husmann DA, Churchill BM

The Journal of urology, 1991

18 participants

Abstract

We evaluated 19 female and 18 male patients with bladder exstrophy, who had completed staged reconstruction, had required no further surgery and underwent urodynamic studies. Of the male population 61% were continent based on a significantly higher urethral continence length (25.8 +/- 6.4 mm., mean plus or minus standard error) and a higher urethral closing pressure (69.4 +/- 5.8 cm. water) compared to the incontinent male population (11.4 +/- 3.1 mm. and 43.4 +/- 4.6 cm. water). No significant difference was noted in the bladder capacity of these 2 groups. Of the female population 57.9% were continent. They also demonstrated a higher urethral continence length (21.1 +/- 4.4 mm.) and a higher urethral closing pressure (62.7 +/- 10.2 cm. water) compared to the incontinent female subjects (8.4 +/- 2.5 mm. and 32.7 +/- 6.9 cm. water). Moreover, those who were continent had a significantly higher bladder capacity (201.2 +/- 39.5 ml.) compared to those who were incontinent (84.3 +/- 23.6 ml.). These findings support a multifactorial mechanism in achieving continence but they suggest that of all the factors urethral length may be the most important.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 18 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free