Evidence Hub

Experience in 100 patients with an ileal low pressure bladder substitute combined with an afferent tubular isoperistaltic segment

Studer UE, Danuser H, Merz VW, Springer JP, Zingg EJ

The Journal of urology, 1995

32 participants

Abstract

Between April 1985 and April 1993, 100 consecutive men underwent lower urinary tract reconstruction after cystectomy. An ileal low pressure reservoir using the Goodwin cup-patch principle was combined with an afferent ileal tubular segment. The early complication rate was 11%, including 2 postoperative deaths due to septicemia. After a median followup of 27 months (range 3 to 96) 14 patients required surgery for late complications (intestinal obstruction, urethral stricture or tumor recurrence, hernia or ureteral stenosis). A total of 32 patients died of metastatic bladder cancer and 7 died of other causes. The functional capacity of the bladder substitute was increased to the desired 450 to 500 ml. after 3 to 12 months, which was paralleled by improving urinary continence. After 1 year 92% of the patients were continent by day and after 2 years 80% were continent at night. Upper tract surveillance with excretory urography, renal ultrasound and serum creatinine estimation has shown 4 left ureteral strictures but not significant upper tract deterioration or ureteral recurrence. Significant reflux was not observed during video urodynamics unless the reservoir was overfilled. During voiding, by outlet relaxation and straining if necessary, the intra-abdominal pressure increase with straining acted equally on the reservoir and ureters. Therefore, unlike voiding with a normal bladder, no isolated intravesical pressure increase occurred and, thus, there was no reflux from the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 32 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free