Evidence Hub

Incidence of cholelithiasis in 125 continent urinary diversions

Holmes DG, Park GY, Thrasher JB, Kueker D, Weigel JW

The Journal of urology, 2001

129 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several studies in animals and humans have demonstrated that ileal resection has an increased association with gallstone formation. However, little reported data exist in regard to continent diversion, and the incidence and relative risk of gallstones. We describe a single institution, single surgeon (J. W. W.) experience with 125 modified Indiana pouch continent urinary diversions constructed in a 14-year period and the subsequent association with gallstones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 129 patients who underwent continent urinary diversion from March 1985 to August 1998 at our institution to assess postoperative cholelithiasis. Complete information was available in 125 of the 129 charts. All patients were followed yearly with ultrasound combined with telephone followup to ensure complete data.

RESULTS: Cholelithiasis was present in 32 of the 125 reviewable patients (25.6%), including 53 men and 72 women. Three men and 8 women who underwent previous or concomitant cholecystectomy for gallstones were excluded from study. Therefore, cholelithiasis developed in 21 of the 114 remaining patients (18.4%), including 5 males (4.3%) and 16 females (14%). Five of the 50 remaining men (10%) and 16 of the remaining 64 women (25%) had gallstones. Mean age at surgery was 43.5 years (range 19 to 73) and mean age at gallstone development was 45 years (range 23 to 77). Mean time from surgery to gallstone development was 3 years (range 1.1 to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 129 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free