Evidence Hub

Early experiences with continent bladder substitution

Lindell O

Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae, 1989

14 participants

Abstract

Since January 1987 a total of 14 patients have undergone continent bladder replacement procedure. The bladder substitute was constructed of ileum (ileal neobladder) in three patients, of an ileocaecal segment (Mainz pouch) in five patients while in six patients a segment of ascending colon (Mayo pouch) was used. Nine male patients underwent a complete bladder substitution after cystoprostatectomy. In five patients a bladder augmentation was performed. Four of these patients were female. They were subjected to subtotal cystectomy which left only one cm of the bladder neck, while the ureters were reimplanted into the pouch. Seven of the nine patients with total bladder substitution are continent during the day and seven at night. All patients in the bladder augmentation group are continent day and night, but one of them has to empty his bladder by intermittent catheterization. Because of stenosis at the ureterocolonic anastomosis, reoperation was performed on two patients more than one year after the primary operation. Except for these two patients, who required surgical revision, the initial results are encouraging and patient acceptance has been excellent.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 14 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free