Evidence Hub

Functional outcome and late complications in patients with continent urinary reservoirs

Taguchi K, Hirose T, Ito N, Kumamoto Y, Tsukamoto T

International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 1997

37 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We reviewed the functional outcome and late complication of continent urinary reservoirs (CUR) constructed with a cecocolonic segment, including the Indiana pouch, in 37 patients treated in our clinic.

METHODS: The CUR procedure was performed on 37 patients, creating partially detubularized (PD) reservoirs in 9 patients, totally detubularized (TD) reservoirs in 16 patients and reservoirs with an ileal patch (IP) in 12 patients. Continence was achieved by the nipple valve in 10 patients and by ileal plication in 27 patients. The mean follow-up period was 46 months (range, 15 to 87 months). The function of the reservoir was evaluated by measurement of the intrareservoir pressure.

RESULTS: Patients with the TD reservoir had less frequent appearance of involuntary, phasic elevation of the intrareservoir pressure (30.8%) than those with the PD reservoir (62.5%). In contrast, this phasic elevation was found in only 1 patient with an IP reservoir. The IP reservoir had the largest capacity accompanied by the lowest maximum intrareservoir pressure. Total incontinence was observed in 2 patients with ileal plication due to disruption of the plicated sutures on the terminal ileum. Frequent difficulty in catheterizing the reservoir was found in 2 patients, and reservoir-ureter reflux was found in 3 renal units. The serum chloride level was significantly elevated after surgery, however, in most patients the levels remained within normal limits.

CONCLUSION: Our experience of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 37 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free