Further experience with the modified rectal bladder (the augmented and valved rectum) for urine diversion
Abstract
Continent diversion with the modified rectal bladder was done in 83 patients and 65 are currently evaluable with followup ranging from 6 to 36 months. There was no postoperative mortality and the morbidity rate was acceptable. Renal function and configuration were maintained in most patients (91%). Dessusception of the colorectal valve was observed in 7.6% of the patients. Evidence was provided that this valve is effective in prevention of regurgitation of the rectal contents to the proximal colon. All patients were continent during the day. Enuresis was noted in 6 patients and all of them responded to imipramine hydrochloride therapy. The results support earlier observations that the procedure offers distinct advantages over ureterosigmoidostomy and the simple rectal bladder.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 83 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Understanding the factors influencing fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith) damage in African smallholder maize fields and quantifying its impact on yield. A case study in Eastern Zimbabwe
- Alarming situation of emerging H5 and H7 avian influenza and effective control strategies
- Livestock and food security: vulnerability to population growth and climate change
- Atmosphere–ocean oxygen and productivity dynamics during early animal radiations
- Characterization of the global distribution and diversified plasmid reservoirs of the colistin resistance gene mcr-9
- The global seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pigs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.