Evidence Hub

Macedo ileal catheterizable reservoir adding the scissors maneuver of channel continence: Long term follow-up

Macedo A, Ottoni SL, Garrone G, Campelo TR, Aragon RG, Macedo EL, Leal da Cruz M

Journal of pediatric urology, 2024

49 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Macedo ileal catheterizable channel was published in 2000 and consists of an enterocystoplasty with a catheterizable channel that precludes the need of the appendix for the efferent channel. After 25 years of experience with this technique, we decided to review our experience in a select subgroup of cases performed and followed exclusively by the author in a non-teaching hospital facility after the latest modifications of the procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since 2008, we have refined our technique with the following modifications: small skin transverse incision instead of longitudinal one, with a semicircular flap for further stoma creation in the midline and importantly the scissors maneuver. This maneuver consists of crossing two 2 cm rectus abdominis muscle flaps in the midline to create a neosphincter over the catheterizable channel. Follow-up was defined as the interval between the date of surgery and last visit to the clinic. We defined stoma continence if the dry interval between catheterization was 4hs. Early and late complications were reported as well as the reintervention rate. Additional procedures in association with bladder augmentation were also appointed.

RESULTS: We have treated 49 patients. Indications were spinal dysraphism (71.4%), mainly myelomeningocele (65.3%), and others (PUV, exstrophy, anorectal anomalies). Urodynamic evaluation showed bladder pressure of high risk for upper urinary tract involvement (66%), urinary incontinence…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 49 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free