Evidence Hub

Continent urinary diversion in the elderly patient. Results with an ileum neobladder

Miller K, Bachor R, Frohneberg D, Egghart G, Hautmann R

Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 1990

101 participants

Abstract

From April 1986 to April 1989 an ileal neobladder was constructed in 101 male patients for complete bladder substitution following radical cystectomy. The patients were retrospectively stratified by age: 86 were over, 15 under the age of 70. No major differences were found in terms of early and late postoperative complications. However, the functional results differed markedly: whereas 89% of the younger patients achieved complete daytime and nighttime continence, only 50% of the older patients reached the same status. It is concluded that strict indications should be observed for complete continent bladder substitution in the elderly.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 101 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free