Evidence Hub

Non continent urinary diversion and other bladder managements in patients with multiple sclerosis

Soust I, Filiette A, Blanchard A, Biardeau X

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie, 2019

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To compare non-continent urinary diversion (NCUD) and other bladder managements in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), in terms of satisfaction and burden of care.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with MS that were proposed a NCUD in our center for refractory lower urinary tract disorders between January 2005 and March 2018 were eligible. Patients were attributed to two distinct groups: "NCUD" and "Other bladder management". The primary endpoint was the satisfaction related to the bladder management quoted by a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10. The secondary endpoints included, among other things, the evaluation of the burden of care associated with the bladder management.

RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included in the "NCUD" group and 11 in the "Other bladder management" group, with 4 patients pursuing with spontaneous voiding, 3 with intermittent catheterization, 2 that have undergone a sphincterotomy, 1 still performing self-intermittent catheterization and 1 with a supra-pubic catheter. The "NCUD" group had a significant higher NRS than the "Other bladder management" group (8.22±1.78 vs. 6.27±2.45; P=0.0056). The daily average duration of care was 16.42minutes in the "NCUD" group and 35.6minutes in the "Other bladder management" group (P=0.1111) CONCLUSION: This exploratory study, even if not conclusive, brings to light the preliminary results needed to elaborate a high level of evidence protocol regarding the satisfaction and the burden…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free