Evidence Hub

The suprapubic arch sling procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a 5-year retrospective study

Heidler S, Ofner-Kopeinig P, Puchwein E, Pummer K, Primus G

European urology, 2010

46 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Up to now, numerous similar products concerning the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) have been developed.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of the suprapubic arch (SPARC) sling system in women with SUI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a long-term retrospective study. All patients underwent a comprehensive pre- and postoperative evaluation. Forty-six women were available for clinical follow-up investigation after SPARC sling placement.

INTERVENTION: Eighty-six women with SUI and a positive cough test underwent SPARC sling placement between June 2001 and January 2004.

MEASUREMENTS: At follow-up all 46 patients underwent a cough test, a pad test, uroflowmetry, and sonographic postvoid residual volume measurement. Women rated their subjective continence status (continent, slightly incontinent, incontinent) and were asked if they would undergo the procedure again and if they would recommend it to a friend. Objective cure was defined as a pad weight 0-1g and a negative cough test. Subjective cure was defined as no use of pads.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up was 5.2 yr. The objective cure rate was 76%; the subjective cure rate was 52%. Sixty-three percent of the patients rated themselves as continent, 33% as slightly incontinent, and 4% as severely incontinent. Most of the women (98%) would recommend the SPARC procedure to a friend and would undergo the procedure again.

CONCLUSIONS: The SPARC…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 46 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free