Evidence Hub

Complications and functional results of Hautmann ileal bladder in a series of 87 patients

Campos-Fernandes JL, Fassi-Fehri H, Badet L, Colombel M, Martin X, Marechal JM

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie, 2005

85 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate the complications, urinary reservoir function and quality of life of patients with Hautmann ileal bladder after cystectomy for bladder urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS: From 1994 to 2004, 87 patients with a mean age of 61.1 years underwent total cystoprostatectomy (n = 85 men) or radical cystectomy (n = 2 women) with Hautmann replacement enterocystoplasty. The mean follow-up was 40.7 months. Continence, quality of voiding, and quality of life were evaluated by self-administered questionnaires (continence questionnaire, DITROVIE score, I-PSS score).

RESULTS: The early complication rate was 30.1%, including 6.9% related to the ileal bladder. The late complication rate was 33.6%, including 20.9% related to the ileal bladder. Four patients died during the perioperative period, 14 patients (17%) died from progression of their cancer and 7 patients (8%) died from an independent cause. One patient was lost to follow-up. Questionnaires were sent to 56 patients and 52 replies were received: 96.2% of patients were continent during the day, 53.8% were continent at night. 4.9% of patients performed self-catheterization for chronic urine retention, 90.4% of patients were satisfied with their replacement bladder and only 5.8% of patients had an altered quality of life.

CONCLUSION: Despite a considerable morbidity rate and a significant nocturnal incontinence rate, the orthotopic Hautmann W-shaped ileal bladder does not appear to alter the patients'…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 85 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free