Evidence Hub

Global epidemiology of acute kidney injury in hospitalised patients with decompensated cirrhosis: the International Club of Ascites GLOBAL AKI prospective, multicentre, cohort study

Kavish R. Patidar, Ann T. Ma, A. Juanola, Anna Barone, S. Incicco, Anand V. Kulkarni, José Luis Pérez Hérnandez, B. Wentworth et al.

The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2025

3,821 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication of cirrhosis. A systematic, global characterisation of AKI occurring in patients with cirrhosis is lacking. We therefore aimed to assess global differences in the characteristics, management, and outcomes of AKI in hospitalised patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicentre, cohort study, we enrolled adults (≥18 years) with decompensated cirrhosis who were hospitalised for a cirrhosis-related complication, with or without AKI, at 65 centres across five continents. We captured AKI prevalence, stage, phenotype, and details on AKI management and clinical course. Universal health coverage index and gross national income per capita were also collected. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Multivariable models including demographic and clinical variables, cirrhosis cause, cirrhosis severity, AKI severity, AKI management variables, universal health coverage, and gross national income were used to analyse independent associations with 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were AKI classification, progression, and resolution. This study is complete and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05387811).

FINDINGS

Between July 1, 2022, and May 31, 2023, we enrolled 3821 patients who were hospitalised for decompensated cirrhosis. Mean age was 57·7 years (SD 13·1), 2467 (64·6%) were men, and 1354 (35·4%) were women. Most patients were White (2128 [55·7%]). 1456 (38·1%, 95% CI 36·6-39·6) of 3821 patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 3,821 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free