Evidence Hub

The aetiology and prevalence of preoperative anaemia in patients undergoing major surgery (ALICE): an international, prospective, observational cohort study

S. Choorapoikayil, D. Baron, D. R. Spahn, S. Lasocki, D. Boryshchuk, L. Yeghiazaryan, M. Posch, E. Bisbe et al.

Lancet Global Health, 2025

2,702 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preoperative anaemia is a major risk factor for perioperative morbidity. Because iron deficiency is widely assumed to be the main cause of anaemia in surgical patients, treatment efforts have focused mostly on iron supplementation. However, the aetiology of anaemia is multifactorial. To further understand the underlying causes and consider a comprehensive approach to anaemia management, we studied the prevalence and aetiology of preoperative anaemia in patients undergoing major surgery.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study was done in 79 hospitals in 20 countries on five continents; patients were aged at least 18 years, undergoing major surgery, and had a postoperative in-hospital stay of at least 24 h. Patients donating autologous blood before surgery were excluded. Data were extracted from the electronic hospital information system and from self-reported information during preoperative examination. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of anaemia, defined as haemoglobin less than 120 g/L for women and less than 130 g/L for men, analysed in all participants, and the aetiology of anaemia, analysed only in patients with anaemia for whom aetiology could be confirmed. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03978260) and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 26, 2019, and Dec 26, 2021, 2830 patients undergoing major surgery were recruited and 2702 patients were included in the analysis (1417 [52·4%] were male, 1279 [47·3%]…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,702 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free