Evidence Hub

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk in adults living with HIV across five continents: a multicohort study

Eliane Rohner

AIDS (London), 2018

210,898 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) incidence rates in adults who started antiretroviral therapy (ART) across the Asia-Pacific, South Africa, Europe, Latin, and North America. Methods: We included cohort data of adults living with HIV who started ART after 1995 within the framework of the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) and the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research in Europe (COHERE). We used flexible parametric survival models to compare regional NHL rates at 2 years after ART start and to identify risk factors for NHL. Results: We included 210,898 adults with 1.1 million person-years (pys) of follow-up and 1,552 incident NHL cases (raw overall incidence rate 142/100,000 pys). After adjusting for age at ART start, first-line ART regimen, calendar period of ART start, and especially current CD4 cell count, NHL rates were similar across regions for most population groups. However, South African women remained at increased risk of developing NHL compared with their European counterparts (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.79, 95% CI 1.19–2.70). In Europe, Latin and North America, NHL risk was highest in men who have sex with men (MSM, aHR 1.30, 95% CI 1.14–1.48), followed by heterosexual men (referent), and women (aHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57–0.78). Conclusions: The risk of developing NHL is higher in women in South Africa than in Europe and higher in MSM compared with heterosexual men and women. Reasons for these…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 210,898 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free