Evidence Hub

A comparison of the characteristics of incontinent and continent stroke patients in a rehabilitation program

Gross JC

Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses, 1998

90 participants

Abstract

The characteristics of incontinent stroke patients who regained continence by the time of their discharge from an acute rehabilitation program were compared with those of patients who remained incontinent. Of the 90 patients who met the inclusion criteria on admission to the program, 45 were continent at discharge. Compared with those who regained continence, the subjects who remained incontinent at discharge took longer to be transferred to the rehabilitation program after the onset of stroke, had lower total Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument scores at admission and discharge, had more episodes of urinary incontinence (UI) during the first 24 hours after their admission, and had smaller increases in functional scores during rehabilitation. When the time from the onset of stroke was controlled, a subsample of those who remained incontinent scored lower only on the social cognition subscale 14-18 days after the stroke, whereas 27-30 days after their stroke their scores on the sphincter control and self-care subscales were lower. UI was not associated with patients' destinations at discharge. The results of this study provide more information about UI after stroke and give direction for future research.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 90 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free