Evidence Hub

Tissue reaction to expanded polytetrafluoroethylene suburethral sling for urinary incontinence: clinical and histologic study

Bent AE, Ostergard DR, Zwick-Zaffuto M

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1993

115 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene suburethral sling for recurrent urinary incontinence has shown an excellent cure rate but a number of complications. This study was designed to evaluate patients who had tissue reaction or removal of the sling, to determine potential causes, clinical course, and eventual outcome.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of consecutive charts was completed for 115 patients who had suburethral sling surgery with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Patients having tissue reaction or removal of sling material were identified, and eight removed sling specimens were analyzed histologically with Milligan's trichrome, hematoxylin and eosin, fibrin, Brown-Brenn bacteria, and Dahl's calcium stains.

RESULTS: Twenty-four patients had reactions to the sling material, and 23 slings were eventually removed. Seventeen of 23 patients having sling removal remained continent. Histologic evaluations revealed gram-positive cocci in all expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch interstices. Fibrous tissue, fibroblasts, and collagen were present in one half of specimens.

CONCLUSION: There is a 23% reaction or removal rate for expanded polytetrafluoroethylene suburethral sling procedures. Seventeen of 23 patients remained continent in spite of sling removal. Histologic studies showed gram-positive cocci in the patch interstices, although prophylactic antibiotic coverage did not prevent infection and cultures from the vaginal or abdominal reaction sites…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 115 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free