Evidence Hub

The Impact of Omission of Intraoperative Frozen Section Prior to Orthotopic Neobladder Reconstruction

Labbate C, Werntz RP, Adamic B, Steinberg GD

The Journal of urology, 2019

357 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend confirming a negative urethral margin prior to orthotopic neobladder reconstruction. We investigated our rate of urethral positive margins and recurrence in the absence of intraoperative frozen section.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and pathological data on 357 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion without intraoperative frozen section. At a median followup of 27 months the rates of positive urethral margins and urethral recurrence were tabulated. Differences in overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with a positive urethral margin were analyzed by Cox regression to generate the HR with the 95% CI.

RESULTS: We identified 6 urethral recurrences (1.6%) during followup. The urethral recurrence rate was not higher in patients with a positive urethral margin (p=0.22). In the 15 patients with positive urethral margins overall survival was unchanged (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.24-4.04). When accounting for lymph node staging, recurrence-free survival was not significantly worse in patients with positive urethral margins (HR 2.33, 95% CI 0.95-5.73).

CONCLUSIONS: Omitting intraoperative frozen section prior to orthotopic neobladder reconstruction appears safe with a rate of urethral recurrence similar to that in historical series. It may allow for increased performance of orthotopic urinary diversions.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 357 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free