Evidence Hub

Modified Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction in patients with successful primary bladder closure elsewhere: a single institution experience

Surer I, Baker LA, Jeffs RD, Gearhart JP

The Journal of urology, 2001

68 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: Achievement of urinary continence in patients with the exstrophy-epispadias complex remains a challenge. We reviewed our experience with the modified Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck repair in patients with bladder exstrophy who underwent primary bladder closure elsewhere.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed exstrophy charts and database of 57 male and 11 female with classic bladder exstrophy who underwent bladder neck repair at our institute and successful primary bladder closure elsewhere during the last 2 decades. Osteotomy was performed at primary closure in 14 (20%) cases and 9 (13%) patients at bladder neck repair in 9 (13%) to aid in stabilizing the urethra and pelvic ring, and to help reapproximate the pelvic floor musculature facilitating urinary continence.

RESULTS: Primary closure was done within 72 hours of life elsewhere in 41 (60%) patients, and between ages 72 hours and 5 years (most during the first month of life) in 27. Paraexstrophy skin flaps were used in 33 (48%) cases, and the most common complication was bladder outlet obstruction of the posterior urethra secondary to the skin flaps. Of the 68 patients 57 (83%) are continent and voiding per urethra without need for augmentation or clean intermittent catheterization, 9 (13%) required clean intermittent catheterization including 7 who underwent continent urinary diversion after failed bladder neck repair, and 2 are still incontinent due to a severe posterior urethral stricture.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 68 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free