Evidence Hub

Complications after cystectomy and urinary diversion in patients previously treated for localized prostate cancer

Tolhurst SR, Rapp DE, O'Connor RC, Lyon MB, Orvieto MA, Steinberg GD

Urology, 2005

35 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the morbidity associated with radical cystectomy in patients who had previously undergone definitive treatment of prostate cancer.

METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken, identifying 35 patients undergoing radical cystectomy with a previous history of radical prostatectomy and/or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The clinical and surgical information was analyzed to assess patient outcomes. Specific attention was given to the rate, severity, and time course of the postoperative complications. In addition, outcomes after orthotopic and continent cutaneous diversion in this patient cohort were examined.

RESULTS: An overall complication rate of 76% was seen in this patient cohort, with 47% of patients experiencing a complication that presented later than postoperative day 30. Radiotherapy was associated with a slightly greater complication rate compared with radical prostatectomy monotherapy (77% versus 71%). Continent urinary diversion (n = 14) was associated with increased morbidity compared with ileal conduit diversion (n = 21). However, a greater percentage of the complications occurring in patients undergoing ileal conduit diversion were major (80% versus 67%).

CONCLUSIONS: Our experience has suggested that radical cystectomy in patients previously treated for prostate cancer with radiotherapy and/or radical prostatectomy may be associated with a greater level of morbidity than previously reported. This finding may be, in part, because a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 35 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free