Evidence Hub

Stone risk after bladder substitution with the ileal-urethral Kock reservoir

Osther PJ, Poulsen AL, Steven K

Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology, 2000

25 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study was carried out to compare urinary biochemical and physicochemical environments in patients who had undergone bladder substitution with the ileal-urethral Kock reservoir, and who had no actual urinary infection, with those of healthy subjects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The participants were 23 male patients who had undergone bladder substitution with the ileal-urethral Kock reservoir and 25 healthy men. All subjects had sterile urine at the time of urine collection. Concentrations of calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, creatinine, citrate, oxalate, and ammonia in 24-h urine samples were measured. Estimates of ion activity products of calcium oxalate (CaOx), calcium phosphate (CaP), brushite (Bru), and magnesium ammonium phosphate (MAP) in urine were calculated according to Tiselius.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference in 24-h urinary volume between patients with a bladder substitute and the healthy controls. For most of the other measured values the results for patients differed significantly from those for controls. The most striking findings were markedly lower urinary excretion rates of citrate (p < 0.0001) and higher urine pH (p < 0.0001) in patients compared with controls. These findings were reflected in significantly higher levels of urinary supersaturation with respect to CaOx (p < 0.0001), CaP (p <0.0001), Bru (p < 0.0001) and MAP (stuvite) (p < 0.0001) in patients with a bladder substitute compared with healthy subjects.

CONCLUSIONS:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free