Evidence Hub

Treatment of interstitial cystitis: comparison of subtrigonal and supratrigonal cystectomy combined with orthotopic bladder substitution

Linn JF, Hohenfellner M, Roth S, Dahms SE, Stein R, Hertle L, Thüroff JW, Hohenfellner R

The Journal of urology, 1998

22 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: We retrospectively evaluate the outcome of interstitial cystitis treated with subtrigonal or supratrigonal cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 22 women and 1 man a mean of 51 years old with interstitial cystitis refractory to conservative therapy 17 were treated with subtrigonal cystectomy and ureteral reimplantation (group 1), and 6 were treated with supratrigonal cystectomy directly above the ureteral orifices (group 2). Both groups underwent orthotopic bladder substitution with an ileocecal pouch (Mainz pouch I).

RESULTS: Postoperatively functional capacity significantly increased from a mean plus or minus standard error of mean 46 +/- 5 to 346 +/- 57 ml. in group 1 and 34 +/- 61 to 319 +/- 29 ml. in group 2 (p < 0.001). Daytime and nighttime urinary frequency significantly decreased from 24 +/- 2 to 8 +/- 1 and 7 +/- 1 to 2 +/- 1 ml., respectively, in group 1 and 28 +/- 2 to 6 +/- 1 and 6 +/- 1 to 1 +/- 1 ml., respectively, in group 2 (p < 0.001). At a mean followup of 93.9 months 14 patients in group 1 (82%) are completely symptom-free, and 1 has tolerable residual urinary urgency and suprapubic pain. At a mean followup of 31.5 months all group 2 patients are symptom-free and void spontaneously, whereas 41% of the group 1 patients require self-catheterization after subtrigonal cystectomy.

CONCLUSIONS: For interstitial cystitis refractory to conservative treatment subtotal cystectomy with orthotopic bladder substitution with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free