Evidence Hub

Clinical outcomes of neobladder or augmentation after cystectomy in locally advanced colorectal cancer involving urinary tract: case series

Lee C, Nam W, Kim CW, Yoon YS, You D

BMC urology, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In most cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) with bladder invasion, ileal conduit (urostomy) is commonly performed. However, with increasing survival rates, quality of life becomes a significant concern, making this approach less favorable. Thus, this study aims to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with CRC who underwent neobladder or augmentation surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of nine patients who underwent neobladder or augmentation surgery combined with surgical management of locally advanced CRC involving the urinary tract between 2011 and 2018 at Asan Medical Center. RESULT: Nine patients with rectal or sigmoid colon cancer underwent neobladder or augmentation surgery following total or partial cystectomy. The median operative time was 341 min (range, 208–459 min), and the median urinary tract reconstruction time was 125 min (range, 66–255 min). Early complications occurred in three patients, and one patient experienced a late complication requiring surgical repair. At one year, seven patients achieved full continence without the need for clean intermittent catheterization. With a median follow-up of 56 months, five patients were disease-free, three had persistent disease, and one had died of disease. CONCLUSION: Quality of life is crucial for CRC patients with improved survival rates. Neobladder or augmentation surgery are feasible options for CRC patients with urinary tract invasion.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free