Evidence Hub

Continent urinary diversion and the exstrophy-epispadias complex

Surer I, Ferrer FA, Baker LA, Gearhart JP

The Journal of urology, 2003

91 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of continent urinary reservoirs has gained wide acceptance, particularly in urinary reconstruction in children with a small capacity or neuropathic bladder. When augmentation cystoplasty is combined with clean intermittent catheterization, patients are often able to achieve continence with low intravesical filling pressures and renal preservation. Often this approach requires fashioning a continent cutaneous stoma, which remains the most challenging aspect of continent urinary reservoirs. We analyzed our experience with continent diversion in patients with exstrophy-epispadias to determine complications and long-term results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective database review of 704 cases of exstrophy-epispadias. Medical records were then used to identify those patients who had undergone creation of a continent urinary reservoir. Charts were reviewed to determine initial diagnosis, augmentation technique, continence mechanism, age, preoperative and postoperative bladder capacity, continence status and complications.

RESULTS: Of the 91 patients identified (68 male, 23 female) who had undergone continent urinary diversion classic bladder exstrophy was present in 80, cloacal exstrophy in 8, complete male epispadias in 2 and female epispadias in 1. The most common techniques for augmentation and continent diversion were ileocystoplasty (41 patients [45%]) and sigmoid cystoplasty (30 [33%]), respectively. Appendix was used in 67 patients (74%)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 91 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free