Evidence Hub

Detrusor wraparound for bladder neck reconstruction in cohort of children with bladder exstrophy

Hafez AT

Urology, 2011

28 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of the detrusor wraparound bladder neck technique of bladder neck reconstruction in 28 children with bladder exstrophy.

METHODS: The records of all patients with bladder exstrophy who underwent detrusor wraparound bladder neck were reviewed. A total of 28 consecutive patients were identified and included 21 boys and 7 girls, with a mean age at surgery of 8.3 years. All patients had undergone previous exstrophy closure (17 staged and 11 complete). Of the 28 patients, 8 (29%) had undergone previous endoscopic injection of a bulking agent at the bladder neck. At surgery, 13 patients (46%) required concomitant ileocystoplasty and a continent outlet. Continence was defined as complete dryness with no urine leakage either through the urethra or the continent outlet.

RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 31 months (range 13-48). All augmented patients were continent using clean intermittent catheterization through the outlet. Complete dryness was achieved in 20 (71%) of 28 patients. However, the continence rate was only 47% in the nonaugmented group compared with 100% in the augmented group. Six of the incontinent children underwent bladder neck injection using a bulking agent but dryness was achieved in only 1 (17%).

CONCLUSION: The detrusor wraparound bladder neck technique is a viable option for bladder neck reconstruction for incontinent children after exstrophy closure. However, bladder augmentation and continent outlet construction are…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 28 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free