Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of continent anal urinary diversion for complicated bladder exstrophy in children by using modified Duhamel's procedure

Fahmy MA, Al Shenawy AA, Shehata SM

Journal of pediatric urology, 2015

19 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A high proportion of children with bladder exstrophy will continue to suffer from urinary incontinence and a miserable life even after a well-performed staged reconstruction in specialized centers. Most of those children usually have a normal anal sphincter allowing construction of a neobladder from the rectum, so they are continent without an abdominal stoma, and do not require frequent catheterization, which greatly contribute to a favorable body image.

OBJECTIVE: In this study a modified Duhamel's rectal pouch done for 19 children, with implication of suitable stapler adopted to construct a rectal bladder with a non-refluxing urterorectostomy, there is a theoretical advantage in our procedure of avoiding a mix of urine and feces. All patients were followed for up to 6 years (2-8 years) for efficacy, safety, subsequent renal complications, and surveillance for any rectal neoplastic changes in this new diversion.

STUDY DESIGN: Assessment of electrolytes, acid base balance, and renal function were carried out regularly and all data were analyzed using the SPSS 9.0.1 statistical package and compared using a paired t test; data were considered significant if p < 0.05. Proctoscopy was performed 6 monthly in the first year then annually thereafter, and at any time if there was any rectal bleeding.

RESULTS: In this group of patients, follow-up revealed no neoplastic changes in the rectal bladder, deterioration in renal function, or major electrolytes disturbance. They…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free