Evidence Hub

Neobladder formation after pelvic irradiation

Hautmann RE, de Petriconi R, Volkmer BG

World journal of urology, 2009

94 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of the use of the ileal neobladder in patients with previous pelvic irradiation.

METHODS: Between January 1986 and July 2008, 1,570 radical cystectomies and 1,002 ileal neobladders were performed at a single institution. From this series, 94 patients (6%) with prior pelvic irradiation were retrospectively identified. In 25 of these irradiated patients, an ileal neobladder was done. All complications within 90 days of surgery were defined and graded using a five-grade modification of the original Clavien system and stratified into 11 categories. Functional outcome data and late complications were reported.

RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of the neobladder patients versus 52% of the non-neobladder patients developed complications occurring within 90 days of surgery. However, grade 3-5 complications were less frequent in the neobladder group. Unusual and serious late complications have been observed. Nineteen out of 25 neobladder patients enjoy perfect night and day time continence. Three out of seven female and 1/18 male patients suffer from treatment refractory severe stress incontinence. One male and one female patients are primarily hypercontinent.

CONCLUSIONS: Salvage surgery (cystoprostatectomy, anterior exenteration) followed by orthotopic lower urinary tract reconstruction can be a safe, effective procedure that can provide a well functioning lower urinary tract in properly selected patients with defunctionalized bladder, tumor recurrence…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 94 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free