Evidence Hub

Functional analysis of laparoscopic intracorporeal Xing's neobladder in long-term follow-up

Wang MS, Zhang SH, Wang JW, Jia BL, Yang FY, Wang WK, Zhang Y, Xing NZ

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 2024

17 participants

Abstract

Evaluation of neobladder function in patients with long-term survival and no recurrence after laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intracorporeal Xing's neobladder. The clinical data of laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intracorporeal Xing's neobladder in long-term survival patients with bladder cancer treated in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from July 2013 to July 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. All 17 patients underwent the surgery by the same surgical team, including 15 males and 2 females, whose mean age at the time of operation was (55.9±7.6) years. Thepostoperative urinary function and renal function were summarized. All operations were successfully completed. The mean operative time was (340±62) min. All patients were followed up for a long time, with a median follow-up time of 80(70, 96) months, Urinary continence was achieved in 17 (100%)casesduring the day and 13 (76.5%) cases at night, with a median bladder volume of 350 (200, 400) ml. All patients had good urinary control after surgery, and no hydronephrosis or creatinine increase was found in reexamination.After the application of Xing's neobladder operation, the patient maintained acceptable urinary control status after the operation, and the long-term follow-up effect was satisfactory.

评估腹腔镜下体腔内邢氏新膀胱术后长期生存无复发患者的新膀胱功能。回顾性分析2013年7月至2018年7月于首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院行腹腔镜下根治性膀胱切除术+体腔内邢氏新膀胱术并长期生存患者的临床资料,总结存活5年以上患者术后排尿功能及肾功能。共17例患者,男15例,女2例,年龄为(55.9±7.6)岁。均由同一手术团队完成。所有手术均顺利完成,手术时间是(340±62)min,17例患者中位随访时间[M(Q1,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 17 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free