Evidence Hub

Rhabdomyosarcoma of the bladder, prostate or vagina: the role of surgery

Filipas D, Fisch M, Stein R, Gutjahr P, Hohenfellner R, Thüroff JW

BJU international, 2004

107 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyse the outcome of children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) of the bladder, prostate or vagina who were treated with chemotherapy, with or without radical surgery or additional radiotherapy, at our institution since 1968.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a total of 107 children with RMS seen between 1968 and December 2001, 22 (mean age 5.9, range 0.5-18) had RMS of bladder/prostate or vagina. Twenty of the patients received primary polychemotherapy (vincristine, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and more recently including etoposide and ifosfamide), two had primary surgery and seven had additional radiotherapy. Fourteen patients had radical cystoprostatectomy, with continent cutaneous urinary diversion with an ileocaecal pouch in seven, in one each a transverse colonic pouch, orthotopic ileocaecal bladder substitution, a rectal reservoir and rectosigmoid pouch and a colonic conduit diversion in two patients.

RESULTS: After a mean (range) follow-up of 8.6 (1.0-26) years, 17 patients had no evidence of disease. Five patients presenting initially with advanced tumour stages died from progressive RMS. Two patients with a continent urinary diversion required ureteric reimplantation for stenosis. In two patients severe bladder contraction after radiotherapy required bladder augmentation.

CONCLUSION: Primary chemotherapy followed by radical surgery of RMS of the prostate and/or bladder allows complete tumour resection in most cases, and yields…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 107 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free