Evidence Hub

Short and Long-Term Outcomes in Hirschsprung Disease: Are the Syndrome-Associated Patients Really Doing Worse?

Gagnon H, Duguay S, Prasil P, Castilloux J

Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2023

52 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Given the lack of data to help caregivers in the follow-up of Hirschsprung disease (HD), this study aimed to compare the functional outcomes of isolated Hirschsprung disease (I-HD) to syndrome-associated Hirschsprung disease (SA-HD) at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years.

METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with HD between January 1990 and May 2021 at our pediatric center was performed to collect data on patient characteristics, investigations, and treatments. Ninety-five patients were identified, of whom 76 were included in the study. SA-HD is defined as a syndrome known to be associated with HD or cognitive impairment.

RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable between groups ( P > 0.05). There were 52 patients with I-HD and 24 with SA-HD. The patients median age was 9 days at diagnosis and 1.5 month at surgery. SA-HD patients became bowel continent at a significantly older age (mean age 8.43 vs 4.94 years, P = 0.0471) and received more bowel continence medications. At 5 years, SA-HD patients requiring ≥2 medications for bowel continence represented 54.5% versus 11.1% of I-HD patients ( P = 0.009). Lastly, SA-HD patients had urinary incontinence at a significantly older age ( P = 0.0136, 5 years).

CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware that SA-HD patients are more prone to bladder dysfunction and became bowel continent at an older age than I-HD patients. They need more and prolonged bowel management medications, and other important…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 52 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free