Evidence Hub

Sigmoidocolocystoplasty with ureteral reimplantation for treatment of neurogenic bladder

Zhang F, Liao L

Urology, 2012

47 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and urodynamic results of sigmoidocolocystoplasty in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 78 augmentation enterocystoplasty cases in our database from 2005 to 2011 to identify 47 patients who had undergone sigmoidocolocystoplasty alone or combined with ureter reimplantation. The indications for surgery and postoperative complications were evaluated. Renal function preservation, increased postoperative bladder capacity, decreased maximal detrusor pressure, and overall patient satisfaction were deemed successful outcomes.

RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 24 months. The mean bladder capacity increased from 160.6 ± 128.3 to 468.5 ± 60.6 mL (P < .001) and the maximal detrusor pressure decreased from 31.1 ± 26.4 to 10.9 ± 4.5 cm H(2)O (P = .002). The serum creatinine level decreased from 270.3 ± 113.6 to 174.4 ± 81.3 μmol/L (P = .001). Most patients resolved the urinary incontinence using clean self-intermittent catheterization. The decrease in the mean number of incontinence episodes and pads used daily indicated a marked improvement in patients' quality of life. Postoperative complications included bowel dysfunction in 5 patients (10.6%), adhesive intestinal obstruction in 4 (8.5%), deteriorating renal function in 3 (6.4%), and vesicoureteral reflux recurrence in 2 patients (4.3%). Nearly all patients expressed satisfaction with the urologic management.

CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 47 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free