Evidence Hub

Prevalence of the Cusp of Carabelli: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bhavyaa R, Sujitha P, Muthu MS, Nirmal L, Patil SS

Annals of human biology, 2021

45,327 participants

Abstract

CONTEXT: The Cusp of Carabelli (CoC) is the most commonly occurring dental morphological trait.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a pancontinental overview on the prevalence of the CoC in primary maxillary second molars and permanent maxillary molars.

METHODS: An electronic search was conducted on ten databases without year restrictions up to July 2020. All cross-sectional studies published in the English language reporting prevalence estimate of CoC were included. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess study quality. Meta-analyses were conducted for studies that reported data using Dahlberg and ASUDAS classification across continents.

RESULTS: For qualitative synthesis, 142 studies (45,327 participants) were included, of which 130 studies had moderate risk of bias. Random effects meta-analysis was performed for 41 studies. For prevalence of CoC in primary maxillary second molars, the estimate was 72% (2,829 participants). The overall percentage attained for permanent maxillary molars was 59% (16,607 participants) for first molars; 8% (2,277 participants) for second molars; and 10% (89 participants) for third molars. Subgroup analysis revealed the European continent reported the highest prevalence in permanent maxillary first and second molars.

CONCLUSION: Primary maxillary second molars recorded highest prevalence of CoC followed by permanent maxillary first, third and second molars. Pancontinental studies with regard to primary maxillary second molars are…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 45,327 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free