Evidence Hub

Adherence with bladder irrigation following augmentation

Peycelon M, Szymanski KM, Francesca Monn M, Salama AK, Risk H, Cain MP, Misseri R

Journal of pediatric urology, 2020

87 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with bladder augmentation (BA) are routinely counseled to irrigate their bladders daily. However, reports of adherence with this regimen are lacking.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adherence to a bladder irrigation protocol and identify risk factors associated with adherence among adults with spina bifida (SB) and BA.

STUDY DESIGN: Adults with SB after BA followed in a multidisciplinary clinic were identified (2017-2019). All patients or caregivers were taught the importance of and the technique for the bladder irrigation protocol prior to and after BA. Patient demographics (age, gender, ambulatory status, and presence of a caregiver in clinics) and surgical details (type of BA, age at surgery, length of follow-up, presence of a catheterizable channel, position of stoma, bladder neck surgery, presence of Malone antegrade colonic enema or ventriculo-peritoneal shunt, and number of stone surgeries) were obtained from the medical record. Patients reported other variables in a standardized clinic questionnaire. Answers were confirmed by health care providers. The variables included who performs clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), size of catheter, frequency of CIC, use of overnight catheterization, difficulties with CIC, number of UTIs, and continence per urethra and per catheterizable channel. Adherence to bladder irrigation was also assessed in the questionnaire. ‛Strict adherence' was defined as bladder irrigation performed ≥6 times/week with ≥120 mL of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 87 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free