Evidence Hub

The Association Between Parity and Fecal Problems Differs by Urinary Status

Brinkman LAM, Hierink GM, Malmberg GGA, Lammers RJM, Visser E, van Eijndhoven HWF, Trzpis M, Broens PMA

Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025

5,670 participants

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and constipation frequently manifest and are risk factors for one another. Studies investigating the association between parity and fecal problems in urinary continent and urinary incontinent women are lacking.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine whether the association between parity and fecal problems differs in urinary continent and urinary incontinent women.

STUDY DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional, retrospective questionnaire-based study. The population was a representation of the general Dutch female population (n = 5,670), including nulliparous (n = 2,790) and parous women (n = 2,880). Data were collected using the Groningen Defecation and Fecal Continence questionnaire, addressing urinary and fecal problems according to validated criteria. Parametric test, χ2 test, Fisher exact test, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used.

RESULTS: Of the urinary incontinent women, 13.7% nulliparous and 6.3% parous women reported a combination of fecal incontinence with constipation. This made urinary incontinent nulliparous women 1.90 times more prone to have both fecal incontinence and constipation (P < 0.001), especially nulliparous women with stress urinary incontinence (odds ratio, 2.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-5.31; P = 0.002). In the urinary continent women, nulliparous women reported significantly more often fecal incontinence as a solitary problem than parous…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 5,670 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free