Evidence Hub

Quality of life in neurogenic patients based on different bladder management methods: A review

Gharbi M, Gazdovich S, Bazinet A, Cornu JN

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie, 2022

3,002 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the overall quality of life and patient satisfaction associated with different bladder management strategies in neuro-urological patients. The second objective was to identify other associated factors that may further influence the patient's quality of life.

DESIGN: Systematic Review.

METHODS: Studies from Pubmed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were extracted using terms relating to 'quality of life', 'satisfaction', in 'neurogenic bladder' combined with 'bladder management methods' that included 'continent and non-continent urine diversion', 'intermittent-catheterization', 'indwelling catheter' and 'condom-catheter'. Only studies with a minimal proportion of 80% of neurogenic bladder patients were included. Search was conducted, and article titles and abstracts were rated. 136 papers were screened and assessed for eligibility.

RESULTS: 25 studies were included in the final analysis and consisted of ten retrospective, nine prospective, five cross-sectional and a single randomized controlled trial. In total, 3002 patients were included, with a majority of male (55%) and spinal cord injury (88%) patients. 167 patients had incontinent urinary diversions, 464 had continent urinary diversions (bladder augmentation with or without cutaneous catheterizable channel), 1698 used intermittent catheterization (self or by an attendant), 550 had an indwelling catheter (urethral or suprapubic), and 123 had condom catheters. Quality of life was assessed using…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,002 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free