Evidence Hub

Peptide microarray IgM and IgG screening of pre-SARS-CoV-2 human serum samples from Zimbabwe for reactivity with peptides from all seven human coronaviruses: a cross-sectional study

Jordan Ashworth, Dayna Mathie, Fiona Scott, Y. Mahendran, M. Woolhouse, O. Stoevesandt, T. Mduluza, F. Mutapi

The Lancet Microbe, 2023

8 citations

Abstract

Background SARS-CoV-2 infections and deaths have been lower in Africa than in other continents, which could be attributed to previous exposure to other pathogens that induce protective cross-immunity or modify the immune phenotype. We aimed to identify and characterise pre-existing cross-reactive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in an African population. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we determined the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 serological cross-reactivity of 339 previously collected pre-pandemic (2000–19) serum samples from adults living in four villages in Zimbabwe (Mupfure, Mutoko, Chiredzi, and Murewa). We tested samples with a COVID-19 rapid diagnostic test then screened for cross-reactivity with peptides from the proteomes of seven human coronaviruses. We compared peptide location, coverage, and intensity and matched peptides predicted to be B-cell epitopes to the Human Immune Epitope Database (HIED). Findings Pre-SARS-CoV-2 serum samples from Mupfure and Murewa showed an overall prevalence of cross-reactivity with the SARS-CoV-2 rapid diagnostic test of 31·9% (95% CI 26·93–37·11). Peptide analysis of samples from all four villages highlighted complex IgM and IgG response profiles against peptides in the spike, nucleocapsid, and polyprotein 1AB proteins across all coronaviruses. Interrogating SARS-CoV-2 peptides recognised by IgG and IgM from the Zimbabwean serum samples against the HIED showed that most were either unique to SARS-CoV-2 or shared only with other…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free