Evidence Hub

Deep learning-based model detects atrial septal defects from electrocardiography: a cross-sectional multicenter hospital-based study

Kotaro Miura, R. Yagi, H. Miyama, M. Kimura, H. Kanazawa, M. Hashimoto, Sayuki Kobayashi, Shiro Nakahara et al.

EClinicalMedicine, 2023

80,947 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

Summary Background Atrial septal defect (ASD) increases the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Despite the potential for risk mitigation through minimally invasive percutaneous closure, ASD remains underdiagnosed due to subtle symptoms and examination findings. To bridge this diagnostic gap, we propose a novel screening strategy aimed at early detection and enhanced diagnosis through the implementation of a convolutional neural network (CNN) to identify ASD from 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). Methods ECGs were collected from patients with at least one recorded echocardiogram at 3 hospitals from 2 continents (Keio University Hospital from July 2011 to December 2020, Brigham and Women’s Hospital from January 2015 to December 2020, and Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center from January 2010 and December 2021). ECGs from patients with a diagnosis of ASD were labeled as positive cases while the remainder were labeled as negative. ECGs after the closure of ASD were excluded. After randomly splitting the ECGs into 3 datasets (50% derivation, 20% validation, and 30% test) with no patient overlap, a CNN-based model was trained using the derivation datasets from 2 hospitals and was tested on held-out datasets along with an external validation on the 3rd hospital. All eligible ECGs were used for derivation and validation whereas the earliest ECG for each patient was used for the test and external validation. The discrimination of ASD was assessed by the area under…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 80,947 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free