Evidence Hub

Metastatic conjunctival melanoma: a multicentre international study

Jain P, Finger PT, Filì M, Damato B, Coupland SE, Heimann H, Kenawy N, Brouwer NJ et al.

The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025

288 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To reveal clinical findings related to metastatic conjunctival melanoma.

METHODS: 10 ophthalmic oncology centres (9 countries and 4 continents) shared data to create a large clinical case series. The main outcome measures were the incidence and cumulative risk of systemic metastasis, study mortality rates and Kaplan-Meier patient mortality after developing conjunctival melanoma metastasis.

RESULTS: Of 288 patients, 29 developed metastasis. Five had metastasis at presentation, were American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cT3-category and exhibited tumour-surface ulceration. Four of five (80%) had melanotic tumours with plical and/or caruncular involvement and died within 1 year. One survived 21 months. In contrast, 24 developed metastases during follow-up (mean 4.6±3.2 years). Their primary tumours were cT1 (n=13/24, 54.1%), cT2 (n=6/24, 25%), cT3 (n=2/24, 8.3%) and 3 cTx (12.5%) at presentation. Death had occurred in 17 patients (n=17/24, 71%) by the end of the study. The cumulative risk of systemic metastasis after treatment was 0.4% (95% CI 0.6% to 2.9%) at 1 year, 8.6% (95% CI 5.1% to 14.3%) at 5 years and 22.3% (95% CI 14.5% to 33.5%) at 10 years. Each increase in AJCC cT category was associated with an 89% higher risk for metastasis (HR=1.89, p<0.001). Among all 29 patients who developed metastasis, those who presented with AJCC cT3 disease were at highest risk (p<0.001). Liver and lung (n=13 each) were the most reported metastatic sites.

CONCLUSION:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 288 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free