Evidence Hub

Functional outcomes and disability after nontraumatic spinal cord injury rehabilitation: Results from a retrospective study

New PW

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2005

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe, in a group of patients undergoing initial inpatient rehabilitation after nontraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), the demographic characteristics, clinical features, and outcomes, with a focus on the functional status and disability.

DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis, 3-year case series.

SETTING: Tertiary medical unit specializing in nontraumatic SCI rehabilitation.

PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 70 adult inpatient referrals with nontraumatic SCI undergoing initial inpatient rehabilitation.

INTERVENTION: Chart review.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were demographic characteristics, clinical features, mortality, length of stay (LOS), neurologic classification, accommodation setting, support services, mobility, bladder and bowel continence, and FIM instrument scores.

RESULTS: Forty-one patients (58.6%) were paraplegic incomplete, 23 (32.9%) were tetraplegic incomplete, and 6 (8.6%) were paraplegic complete. Eight patients (11.4%) died before hospital discharge. Of those who survived, 47 (75.8%) were discharged home, 11 (17.7%) were transferred to a nursing home, and 4 (6.4%) went elsewhere in the community. The geometric mean LOS was 55.8 days. Nine patients (14.5%) were discharged walking unaided, 27 (43.5%) were walking at least 10 m with a gait aid, and 26 (41.9%) were wheelchair dependent for mobility. Thirty patients (48.4%) were voiding on sensation, 7 (11.1%) used intermittent catheterization, 23 (37.2%) had an indwelling catheter,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free