Evidence Hub

Urinary retention after orthotopic neobladder substitution in females

Finley DS, Lee U, McDonough D, Raz S, deKernion J

The Journal of urology, 2011

21 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: Urinary retention is a common complication after orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion. We reviewed a case series of women who underwent neobladder creation and discuss anatomical findings, and urinary retention etiology and prevention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all orthotopic neobladder urinary diversions in female patients performed at our institution from 1999 through 2010. We abstracted baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, operative information, and postoperative clinical, urodynamic, imaging and secondary procedure followup. We defined urinary retention as the need for intermittent catheterization.

RESULTS: We identified 21 female patients who underwent neobladder diversion. Median age at cystectomy was 62 years (range 43 to 77). Median followup was 3 years (range 3 to 138 months). Of the patients 14 underwent ileocolic diversion, 6 underwent Studer ileal diversion and 1 underwent preservation of a right colon augmentation. All patients underwent prior or concurrent hysterectomy. In 2 patients with a history of genitourinary tuberculosis neobladder-vaginal fistulas developed postoperatively and they were excluded from analysis. Of the 19 female patients with a neobladder included in analysis 7 (36.8%) experienced urinary retention requiring clean intermittent catheterization. Associated abnormalities included neocystocele formation in 6 cases, anastomotic stricture in 1 and progressive neurological disease…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 21 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free