Evidence Hub

Headache Resolution After Rathke Cleft Cyst Resection: A Meta-Analysis

Altuwaijri N, Cote DJ, Lamba N, Albenayan W, Ren SP, Zaghloul I, Doucette J, Zaidi HA et al.

World neurosurgery, 2018

276 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Rathke cleft cysts (RCC) are benign lesions of the sella that often present with headache. It is not currently well established whether surgical resection of RCC results in resolution of headache. We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the effect of RCC resection on headache resolution.

METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched through June 2017 for articles that evaluated the effect of RCC resection on headache resolution. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using fixed-effects and random-effects models.

RESULTS: Ten case series with 276 patients were included. Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) was used to resect RCC in all of the studies. Only 1 patient in 1 study underwent transcranial surgery. Using the fixed effect model, the overall headache resolution prevalence was 71.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 65.3%, 77.3%) among patients who underwent resection of RCC (I2 = 76.9%; P-heterogeneity < 0.01). Subgroup analysis based on center (P-interaction < 0.01) and continent (P < 0.01) showed a higher resolution in studies conducted in a single center (79.8%; 95% CI 73.7%, 84.8%) than in multiple centers (40.0%; 95% CI 26.9%, 54.8%) and a higher resolution in studies conducted in Asia (85.0%) than in Europe (61.5%) or North America (65.7%). Metaregression analysis was significant on mean follow-up time (slope = 0.03; P = 0.02), percentage of women (slope -0.05; P < 0.01), journal impact factor (slope 0.73; P < 0.01), and study quality (slope…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 276 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free